Compiled by Marissa Wang.
Articles
Rules of Engagement When the Troops Appear at Polling Sites
Dan Maurer examined the possibility that the Trump administration could deploy federal troops or immigration agents near polling places and argued that state election officials should proactively educate voters on their rights and the legal limits on military and law enforcement. Maurer contended that clear public “rules of engagement” could reduce intimidation and potential confrontations if armed federal personnel appear at election sites.
Open, noncoercive, and safe elections are a hallmark of a healthy democracy. Today, those characteristics are in jeopardy. In January, President Trump boasted of his administration’s first year back in office and said, “When you think of it, we shouldn’t even have an election.” Speaking on former Deputy FBI Director Dan Bongino’s podcast in early February, Trump claimed that illegal immigrants “were brought to our country to vote, and they vote illegally.” He continued, “The Republicans should say, we should take over the voting in at least 15 places. The Republicans ought to nationalize the voting.” And in September 2025, Trump blamed “radical left democrats” for political violence and designated “antifa” activities as “domestic terrorism.”
These three statements come amid a campaign by popular MAGA influencers and some members of Congress urging Trump to deploy forces at polling sites. The fact that 46 percent of the public supports the idea of the National Guard monitoring or patrolling the ballot provides the administration enough of a basis to claim it has a “mandate” to do so.
The Remediation Gap in Civilian Camera Security
Branko Ruzic explained that if the U.S. became the target of the increasingly common exploitation of civilian internet-connected cameras by foreign states for intelligence gathering, the current framework of U.S. cybersecurity policy would not be equipped to handle the security risks posed by pre-existing civilian camera networks.
Hacking civilian cameras is now a recurring feature of war. The question for the United States is whether its legal framework can compel remediation of the millions of exploitable devices already deployed across U.S. cities. A walk through the existing statutory landscape suggests the answer is no, and that the authority architecture capable of changing that answer would introduce risks of its own.
Podcasts
Lawfare Daily: Pope Leo XIV Takes on Silicon Valley with Christopher Hale and Renée DiResta: Renée DiResta sat down with Christopher Hale to discuss Pope Leo XIV’s entrance into the artificial intelligence (AI) debate, what it means to “disarm” AI, the perspective of the Pope’s new encyclical, Silicon Valley’s response, and more.
Announcements
Lawfare’s Tracking Government Non-Compliance in Habeas Corpus Cases is a database of more than 400 immigration habeas cases in which the team identified government non-compliance with federal court orders. It compiles hundreds of dockets and filings into an easily searchable format and will continue to be updated as new cases arise. You can search the database here.
The Jan. 6 Project now holds five years of Lawfare analysis related to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol and the government’s response. Explore our pieces, podcasts, and document repositories here.
Lawfare’s Domestic Deployments Tracker maps federal non-disaster deployments of the military within U.S. borders. You can read more about the tracker here.
The Trials of the Trump Administration, our coverage of Trump’s executive actions and their legal challenges, now includes a page devoted to tracking the status of Alien Enemies Act cases in federal courts. Find the page here.
Lawfare’s work is only possible through the support of our readers. Support Lawfare through our ongoing Givebutter campaign.
Support Lawfare
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and LinkedIn. Become a material supporter on Patreon. Sign up to receive Lawfare in your inbox. Check out relevant job openings on our Job Board.


🕯️ The Billionaire’s Escape
Let’s look at the billionaires building the tools,
Who treat all the everyday workers like fools.
They profit from panic, from armor and steel,
And then pack their bags for a sweet foreign deal. 🕯️
The founder of Palantir built up his wealth,
By tracking our data in shadow and stealth.
But when the world rumbles with weapons of war,
He buys a safe mansion upon a new shore. 🕯️
Down in Argentina, his family will stay,
A twelve-million-dollar estate far away.
He’s seeking a shelter from dangers and dread,
While everyday citizens face it instead. 🕯️
He dodges the taxes on fortunes he keeps,
While everyday America worries and weeps.
We pay for the military, carrying the fee,
While he simply moves where the taxes are free. 🕯️
He meets with the leaders of nations in need,
And uses his fortune to plant a new seed.
With billions of dollars, he pushes his weight,
To influence laws in a struggling state. 🕯️
They claim to be patriots, claiming our trust,
But leave the poor taxpayers coughing in dust.
They preach about duty, they preach about pride,
Then look for a distant new country to hide. 🕯️
It shows a division that’s terribly clear,
Between those who profit and those who stay here.
The citizens shoulder the cost of the fight,
While tech billionaires simply book a new flight. 🕯️
So hold up your candle and look at the facts,
At those who get rich and avoid the new tax.
For true patriot duty is more than a boast,
When war-machine billionaires run from the coast. 🕯️